recycling plant-360G telehandler
360 G Impressive cycle times at the Recycling Yard
19.09.2025 Grefrath-Oedt , Germany Author: Lisa-Maria Heigl; Product Marketing Manager Waste & Recycling

Telehandler in heavy-duty use saves about 50 % on fuel

“How efficient is a telehandler in heavy-duty recycling applications? A field test at the B.E.B. waste transfer station in Grefrath-Oedt shows that the SENNEBOGEN 360 G, equipped with a 2-cubic-meter bucket, achieved an average cycle time of 59 seconds and moved 116 cubic meters of material per hour. Compared to the wheel loader tested in parallel, material handling increased by 38 %. At the same time, specific fuel consumption per cubic meter of material moved was 47 % lower.

In recycling and waste management , short loading cycles, low fuel consumption, and a clear view of the work area are key factors in determining a machine’s cost-effectiveness. These exact requirements were the focus of the test operation of the SENNEBOGEN 360 G telehandler at B.E.B. bewegt, a subsidiary of Berk Recycling GmbH.

FROM MIXED RESIDUAL WASTE TO BULKY WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS

The telehandler was used in ongoing recycling operations for various materials and tasks.

About 30 % of the daily volume consisted of mixed residual waste, including tires and bulky waste. This material was loaded directly onto trucks. The remaining 70 % consisted of coarse construction debris, which the 360 G fed into a screening plant. After processing, the finer bulk material was loaded for further processing.

This meant the machine had to meet two typical requirements of a recycling facility: fast truck loading in a limited space and continuous feeding of a processing plant.

Telehandler vs. Wheel Loader: The Results of the Comparative Test

recycling plant-360G telehandler
With a telehandler: Short cycle time when feeding the screening plant thanks to perfect visibility and 8.5-meter lifting height.
Recyclinghof
Using a conventional wheel loader to feed the same screening plant.

To compare productivity and efficiency under real-world operating conditions, the SENNEBOGEN 360 G and a wheel loader were tested under comparable conditions.

The 360 G operated with a 2-m³-bucket and took an average of 59 seconds per loading cycle. It thus moved 116 m³ of material in one hour.

The wheel loader used took an average of 1 minute and 26 seconds per cycle and achieved a material handling rate of 84 m³ per hour.

Key Findings at a Glance

Key FigureSENNEBOGEN 360 GComparable wheel loaders
Average cycle time59 seconds  86 seconds
Material handling comparison116 m³/h84 m³/h
Difference in material throughput+38 %Reference
“Specific fuel consumption per m³47 % lowerReference

In the test, the SENNEBOGEN 360 G reduced the duration of a loading cycle by about 31 %, moved about 38 % more material per hour, and used 47 % less fuel per cubic meter moved than the comparable wheel loader.

47 % lower specific fuel consumption

The comparative test also revealed a significant difference in fuel consumption: The specific fuel consumption of the SENNEBOGEN 360 G was 47 % lower than that of the wheel loader used in the test.

This means that, per cubic meter of material moved, the telehandler required nearly half the amount of fuel.

When evaluating efficiency, it is not only fuel consumption per operating hour that matters. The decisive factor is how much material is actually moved with the amount of fuel used.

Why is the SENNEBOGEN 360 G efficient when feeding screening plants?

A key advantage stems from the combination of reach, lift height, and visibility. The SENNEBOGEN 360 G achieves a maximum lift height of up to 8.5 m. Its hydraulically elevating Multicab provides a viewing height of up to 4.25 m, thereby improving visibility into trucks, containers, and the work area.

When feeding the screening plant, this allows the operator to position material precisely without having to make unnecessary maneuvering movements. The compact design also facilitates work in the confined spaces of a recycling center.

The elevated driver’s position also offers advantages when loading trucks, as the driver has a better view of the loading area. Machine operator Thomas Bergerfurth particularly highlights the versatility of the 360 G and its advantages when loading trucks in tight spaces.

“The 360 G is like a Swiss Army knife...

… unbeatable when loading trucks in confined spaces. Exactly what we need in our everyday work.”

Thomas Bergerfurth
Machine operator
recycling plant_360G_telehandler

Telehandler with wheel loader technology for heavy-duty applications

The SENNEBOGEN 360 G combines the features of a telehandler with technology from the wheel loader sector. This includes, among other things, Z-kinematics, which enables high forces at the bucket. The telescopic boom simultaneously extends both reach and working height.

For industrial material handling, this combination means that a single machine can perform a variety of tasks – from picking up and transporting bulk materials to feeding equipment and loading trucks. Various attachments and the hydraulic quick-change system further expand the range of applications.

Conclusion: high material throughput with low fuel consumption

The field test at B.E.B. zeigt demonstrates how the SENNEBOGEN 360 G can be used in demanding recycling operations.

In a direct comparison, the telehandler achieved a shorter cycle time of 59 seconds and a higher material handling rate of 116 m³ per hour than the wheel loader used. At the same time, the specific fuel consumption per cubic meter of material moved was 47 % lower.

Its combination of a lifting height of up to 8.5 m, a cab that raises with the boom, a compact design, and wheel loader technology makes it particularly well-suited for feeding plants and loading trucks.

Frequently Asked Questions About the SENNEBOGEN 360 G in Recycling

What is the material handling capacity of the SENNEBOGEN 360 G in recycling applications?

In a field test conducted by B.E.B., the SENNEBOGEN 360 G achieved a material handling rate of 116 m³ per hour using a 2-m³-bucket. The comparable wheel loader achieved 84 m³ per hour.

How much fuel does the SENNEBOGEN 360 G save compared to a wheel loader?

In the comparative test, the specific fuel consumption of the SENNEBOGEN 360 G per cubic meter of material moved was 47 % lower than that of the wheel loader used.

How fast is a loading cycle with the SENNEBOGEN 360 G?

During the test, the average cycle time for the SENNEBOGEN 360 G was 59 seconds. The comparable wheel loader took an average of 86 seconds.

Stay up to date

Register now for the SENNEBOGEN press distribution list!

Your contact person

Press inquiries: [email protected]

SENNEBOGEN
Maschinenfabrik GmbH

Sennebogenstraße 10
94315 Straubing